St. Stephen's History
150th Anniversary Reminiscences and History

 by James Elliott Lindsley 29 June 2001

 Your invitation to people to share their memories of St. Stephen’s naturally arrested my eager attention, and it gives me the opportunity to meander “down memory’s lane.”  St. Stephen’s Church is one of the cardinal things of my life, and I will be grateful to that place and those people as long as I live.  What I want to say about my years at St. Stephen’s (1957 to 1966) emerges from my perception of the place and what it enabled me—and those who trusted in me as their leader—to do when I was rector there.  Make no mistake:  When I arrived in Millburn , and all the time I was there, I was inspired and supported by lay people, many of them lifelong members of the parish.

The Episcopal Church was much different in 1957 than it is today; indeed, the face of Christianity in America was much different.  There was a much-touted “return to religion” after World War II.  This meant the Christian religion.  Zen, Islam, New Age, and certainly, a prohibition of prayer in public schools, were unthinkable as alternatives to the religion of Jesus Christ in America at that time.  The Christian religion, newly expressed and frankly explained, was “in the air.”  It was sometimes even cocktail party discussion.  Married couples with young children opted into the novel intellectual respectability of Christianity, especially Christianity in the suburbs where new housing developments replaced old farms and woods.

This was the situation when I arrived at St. Stephen’s in late August 1957.  This was also the sort of robust postwar Christianity I had been trained to expect.  My predecessors had entirely different challenges and opportunities and, of course, problems, as have my successors.  Whatever I say must not be interpreted as dismissive of Hugh Dickinson, who was rector of St. Stephen’s from 1922 to 1957.  He faced more than his share of burdens in those thirty-five years.  He was also a familiar and esteemed member of the wider Millburn community.  In a sense, Mr. Dickinson had been outpaced by the new people in St. Stephen’s who were part of the postwar religious renascence I have already mentioned.  The renewal of St. Stephen’s was well on the way before I arrived there.  The Sunday School, for instance, was solid and growing thanks to energetic lay leadership.  There were two women’s groups—one met in the daytime,  and one, in the evening.

There were three parish buildings:  The Church, built in 1853, was designed by a genius, John Priest.  The Rectory was added in 1867 and had been almost untouched since then, and the Parish Hall, built in Church Street about 1897, had been sold and subsequently repurchased.  It was then moved across the street and attached to the church.  But it was inadequate for the Sunday School and other programs that the times demanded.  My first memory of the church will always remain with me—its smell!  Most of our churches had lost the Episcopal smell by 1957, but St. Stephen’s retained it for sure.  For those who cannot remember the Episcopal smell—and that means most of our church people today—I can only describe it as a blend of old velvet pew cushions and the sawdust that filled the prayer hassocks, contained in a building that was unused six days of the week.  We had a wonderful sexton, Theodore Richwood, complete with academic gown on Sundays.  He was uncomprehending when I asked him to spread the pew cushions out on the sunny lawn so they might lose some of their fragrance.  The Evening Group of the Women’s Guild bought replacements for the hassocks, and before long both of the women’s groups raised the money to install a new floor, purchase appropriate carpeting, and paint the church interior.  I should say, incidentally, that the Rectory was entirely redecorated before I arrived, thanks to the contacts of Fred Thompson, a steady and wise Vestryman and Warden.  For three years the Rectory was a happy, busy home for my collie and me—and an ever happier home after Barbara and I were married at St. Stephen’s in 1960.

A nursery wing had been attached to the old Parish Hall about 1954—a certain sign of the renewal of the parish before my arrival.  But still, the old building was but an auditorium, a kitchen, and an upstairs room that had once been a popular poolroom.  We had no problem explaining the need for a truly functional educational and social building.  If memory serves, the parish house we built in 1961 cost $60,000.  We were very proud of it, and it was fully used for parish purposes.  But time is a harsh teacher, and I am ashamed now to think that while the church was designed to be accessible to handicapped people in 1853, the parish house we built so many years later ignored the problems posed by steps and stairs.  In the early 1960’s we started a nursery school.  Some parishioners were not happy about this, for they believed it undermined public education.

St. Stephen’s had always been a fairly “Low” Episcopal Church.  That was my own preference too.  But suburban Episcopal churches in those days, and certainly now, found it necessary to be sensitive to newcomers from varied traditions.  Therefore, we began to use Eucharistic vestments at the 8 o’clock service.  I shied away from using them at 9:15 (our most-attended service) and never dreamed of wearing a chasuble at 11 o’clock, which was almost entirely attended by hard-shell traditionalists who wanted no changes at all.  But before long I began to hear those old-timers grouse that the “eight o’clockers” got to see the “glad rags,” so why shouldn’t they?  So I began wearing chasubles at the third service.  I doubt any Episcopal church ever introduced Eucharistic vestments in an easier way.  That was the kind of people I found among lifelong members of St. Stephen’s.   

It may be of some interest for future liturgical historians to know that we never even thought of using a Pascal candle.  We began having baptisms at whichever of the three services was attended by the family.  Very few burial services were held in the church in the years immediately prior to my time, and I was surprised—how naive I was—when families expressed amazement that they were welcome, even urged, to use the church building for that purpose.  On the whole, it was an easy transition, since the embalmer of choice was on the opposite corner of Rector Street —as well I know, for once he left a corpse forgotten on his back porch all night.  There was no funeral pall until one was copied from the pall at St. Peter’s, Morristown .  I preferred (and still do) chasubles made of plain white linen or, better yet, broadcloth, and these were also made for us by Margaret Dormand, an indomitable and loyal churchwoman from England.  She was always ready to sew for the altar.  I think she made a new fair linen cloth for us each year.  When Father Bruce—who had been locum tenens after Mr. Dickinson retired—died, his family gave me a choice of his vestments, and I selected a red set and a white set and gave them to St. Stephen’s.  When I arrived, there were brass branch candlesticks on the altar and tall pavement lights; I do not remember Eucharistic lights.  In time we were able to buy from, I think, the Wareham Guild a set of silver-plated cross and candlesticks.  They were made with chains so they could be secured, for the church was open day and night.  I never had—or saw—a key to St. Stephen’s Church.  I am sorry to know that circumstances have changed and now it is necessary to keep the buildings locked.  I think the sterling silver used in my time was later stolen.  The Communion service was by Cooper of Amity Street in New York —chalice, paten, and flagon.  This was the original set, and the only one we had.  There was also a pair of silver cruets and, if memory serves, a lavabo.  The liturgical revival (or whatever it’s called now) had not quite arrived in ordinary parish churches in my time at St. Stephen’s, and though the cathedral in Newark had a freestanding altar after the 1953 renovations there, I never seriously entertained that idea for St. Stephen’s.  I think it works very well.

Quite early in my time the choir departed the chancel, and we reverted to Priest’s original plans for a wide-open chancel.  The choir “stalls” I found were actually pews which had been moved to the chancel, and they were too big and cumbersome for that limited space.  People were very encouraging about moving the choir to the nave just in front of the organ (then still located behind the organ screen to the left of the chancel).  The proximity of organist and singers was very convenient, and the acoustics decidedly improved.

The organ itself was a floor-model Estey, bought I think in 1932 to replace the ailing but much larger and golden-throated Johnson.  We were excited to be given an Aeolian-Skinner from a residence, and we moved it carefully from the house to storage.  I forget why we never did install that organ.  Over the years the Estey proved less and less satisfactory, and frankly, the musical expectations of Episcopalians made them critical of the Estey.  The congregation was ready for a completely new organ by 1964.  Of course, I was eager to see a new one in place, but I cannot say I had all that much to do with acquiring it.  A committee of two or three energetic men, consulting with real experts, moved fairly quickly.  Douglas Rodie, whose young son Gerald had just died, assured the committee that he would foot a major part of the cost.  It was at my last Vestry meeting, September 1966, that Mr. Von Beckerath sent us the contract.  Alas, it was in German, and of course, the Vestry couldn’t sign it until it had been reviewed by a lawyer knowledgeable in German.  So, to my everlasting disappointment I have never been able to say that the splendid organ at St. Stephen’s was purchased in my time there.

In reciting these liturgical developments, I have jumped ahead in years.  As I recall, we prospered nicely but certainly not in any phenomenal way in those late 1950’s.  Why shouldn’t we have prospered?  Springfield and Millburn Township were growing—and as might have been pointed out, Christ Church was too big!   Furthermore we had a decent level of camaraderie and informality in the congregation.  Nothing promotes prosperity more than the feeling that growth is in the air.

I think the church seated considerably more people in those days before the new organ was situated in the back of the nave.  There is an old statement one hears from time to time about the good old days when “they had to bring benches in” to seat the crowds.  What benches?  Who brought them in?  Church statistics are notoriously optimistic.  I am particularly sensitive about this because my immediate successor claimed I padded the figures.  So let me be clear:  We never had to bring in benches.  There was one service—possibly a midnight Christmas Eucharist—when some chairs had to be brought from the parish hall.  I recall a time when we could expect more than 250 on a Sunday morning.  For a brief time we hit 300, or maybe a few more.  In those days Irving Livingston counted at the second and third services.  Later someone gave us an automatic hand clicker that was by no means noiseless.  People complained about the sound of “counting souls,” and I think we discouraged the sexton from using the clicker.

There were always about twenty people at the 8 o’clock Eucharist, perhaps more in summer.  We had a rollicking second service at 9:30 (changed to 9:15 because of traffic at Springfield four corners).  Eucharist was every third Sunday; otherwise, Morning Prayer.  We liked to think there were 200 at that service, children and parents.  In place of a formal sermon there was what—I hate to admit it—I called an “aisle talk” geared to all ages, and an adult class later, concurrent with the Sunday School.  I remember that for a time we had a reliable attendance of forty at that class.  It was usually led by a seminarian or tutor from General Theological Seminary.  St. Stephen’s began using the seminary people in the mid 1950’s.  The adult class was sometimes raucous—indeed, riotous the day one zealous member informed us that we should convert all the Jews we knew to Christianity.

It is ironic that it was the third service at 11 o’clock that received most of our attention.  The choir had one or two paid members when I arrived.  There was always an Offertory anthem.  As in most Episcopal churches at the time, it was Morning Prayer except for the first Sunday in the month.  We all know that there has been a dramatic change in this schedule.  It is a rare Episcopal church today that does not celebrate the Communion at every Sunday service.

When I left, I told the parish secretary that I supposed our communicants would go over the 500 figure when the next Parochial Report was due.  My prediction was accurate, as I later learned.  The subsequent claim about padding the figures arose when the communicant list and the mailing list were confused.  Like every church or other organization we had a “Friends” list.  These were people to whom we mailed our weekly bulletin.  I need to make it clear that they were never counted as members of St. Stephen’s.  The two lists, communicants and members, were always kept separate as long as I was rector.  Having mentioned these figures, I don’t want to be accused again of statistical optimism, so authentic records should be consulted to support a memory that is reaching back almost 45 years.

Again I need to make clear that I am speaking of another era.  The immediate neighborhood of St. Stephen’s was largely people bearing Italian names.  The adjacent South Mountain Estates area was considered Jewish; Vauxhall was black.  Short Hills was, well, you know.  But forty and more years ago we were not usually candid about ethnic distinctions.

Thinking about changes at St. Stephen’s, I need to tell about the longtime, but by then retired, Senior Warden who had for years parked his car smack in front of the church entrance.  He was a fairly gruff and critical man, and entered the church one Sunday furious because he’d had to park his car halfway down the block.  He let me know that for years he parked the car in “his” space—but I could tell he was terribly pleased that there was a parking problem at church.  I should add also that we had by this time blacktopped the Dickinsons’ back lawn and garden, only to find some years later that St. Stephen’s didn’t own much beyond the back stoop of the Rectory.  Fortunately for us, the true owners of that space realized the church had used and maintained the land for so long that it would be easier for them to give St. Stephen’s a quitclaim for the parcel.

Speaking of that Senior Warden, he had a second wife who was an unreconstructed Presbyterian.  She attended services regularly and was a warm friend to me.  But I would never have thought to ask her to be confirmed.  She, for her part, often twitted me about my unmarried state.  Once, when she was reminding me that time was passing by, I said to her, “All right, you get confirmed, and I’ll get married.”  She took my challenge, and I had to honor hers.

There were still one or two people in the parish who remembered when Christ Church in Short Hills was founded.  The split doomed St. Stephen’s to some years of poverty, and many years of feeling like poor relations, for it occurred about the same time that some of the initial supporters of the parish died or moved away.  The rector at the time (1882) was Lewis P. Clover who, as an artist in the Midwest, is said to have painted the first portrait of Abraham Lincoln, whose wife, Mary Todd, was Clover’s cousin.  Among other things, Dr. Clover was remembered for telling the congregation when Christ Church was formed, “Don’t let them take your church away from you”—gratuitous advice inasmuch as Dr. Clover himself soon resigned.  There was then a garden path with a gate leading from the “vestry” (i.e., sacristy) door to the front door of the Rectory, and Dr. Clover was remembered as walking after church to the house down that path arm in arm with Mrs. Clover.  The ghost of their daughter, Bertha, who died New Year’s Day 1882, is supposed to have haunted the Rectory.  Indeed, strange noises like heavy trunks being dragged about did emanate from the attic.  Even my collie dog was disturbed by them.  But they ceased soon after I married.  Barbara still says Bertha didn’t like competition.

Returning to the distant past, I might say that when I came to St. Stephen’s, there were still one or two people who remembered Israel Dodd Condit, the lay founder of the parish.  One of them remembered him saying as they walked home after Evensong that “kindliness is the most important thing.”  When I first heard that, my fresh-from-seminary orthodoxy dismissed it.  Since then, and probably because of the inhumanities life makes known to us, I have appreciated Mr. Condit’s sentiment.  It emerged from his practical experience as a Christian who in a long life lost practically everything but his devotion to Christ.  I remember another thing someone quoted him as saying.  The 1890’s were a halcyon period for men’s clubs and Bible classes in churches.  Israel Condit had seen sharp ups and downs in the fortunes of St. Stephen’s.  Hearing that the number of men in the Bible Class had just exceeded one hundred under the able rector William A.  Wasson, he exclaimed of himself, “Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace.”  It was a true nunc dimittis for Condit, who died soon after, rejoicing in one of the moments of renascence that seem to characterize St. Stephen’s as it seeks to minister in various times to the people who seek it out.

Speaking of former rectors, I have often thought of the time I called on a lifelong member of the parish, a woman of few words.  Conversation was uphill work for me, and after we had covered the weather several times, I turned in desperation to the long-ago days at St. Stephen’s.  That subject didn’t arouse much response either, so I began to name my predecessors.  When I came to Mr. Van Ingen, I got a spirited, “He was the best one we ever had.”  Whenever I have entertained exalted ideas about myself, I’m corrected by remembering that.  I might add that Mr. Van Ingen was still well remembered and esteemed, though he had left the parish forty years before I arrived.  It meant a very great deal to me when his daughters returned to the area and re-entered the St. Stephen’s community.  This reminds me of another historical episode.

In the 1890’s, before the days of Mr. Van Ingen, the incumbent or a member of his family installed new altar rails and a new pulpit.  Both were of brass, common ware, straight out of a church-furnishings catalogue, unworthy of a building designed by John Priest.  Sometime in Mr. Dickinson’s time those brass rails were replaced by ones thought to be similar to the originals.  But the old pulpit, which many people hated to see discarded, leaned up against the west wall of the church.  It was eventually given to the Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Newark.  But old timers still remembered it—and wanted to get it back.  We negotiated with the Vestry of St. Mary’s and made an exchange.  We had a fund drive to restore the pulpit, which had in the meantime lost its wineglass base and steps.  I think it was on Pentecost 1958 that the new-old pulpit was dedicated in memory of James Van Ingen.  Several years later I had the words from Acts, “Sir, we would see Jesus" inscribed on the pulpit’s desk.  I did this as a reminder to myself, but I am afraid I have not always remembered those words.

A tradition at St. Stephen’s had been the Fish-and-Chips Luncheon the women of the parish served once or twice a year.  Indeed, it was a tradition in the entire downtown community, for almost everyone in the schools, banks and stores poured into the parish hall to partake of what was supposed to be the best luncheon anywhere.  It was catered by a couple from Paterson.  My first experience of it was during a blizzard.  People were already arriving when the caterers telephoned from, I think, South Orange Avenue to say they wouldn’t be able to make it.  I told our Women’s Guild president, who was almost hysterical, to find out where the van was, and I’d go and get them.  However, the couple did manage to get through, and when they arrived he declared, “I guess you got a new minister.”  He didn’t know how really heroic I was, for I don’t like fish.

Church Suppers were genial occasions.  I’d known them since childhood.  My parents always took tickets for them in country churches or the Grange.  They have an old-fashioned Norman Rockwell ambience of friendship and cheer about them.   But I confess that my attitude about church suppers as fund-raisers changed soon after I went to St. Stephen’s.  The Fish-and-Chips Luncheon was all right because it was catered.   That reduced the amount of labor for our women.   Also it was popular in town and a stellar public-relations event.  But when I saw our elderly women toting heavy trays in order to help pay my salary, I secretly resolved to discourage that kind of project, for it depended upon the good will and hard work of a comparatively few people in the congregation, and all of them women.  As I look back now, I can’t remember any church suppers at St. Stephen’s, though I’m sure we had one or two.  Our women’s fund-raisers were rummage sales, bazaars, fashion shows—very popular—and, once, a costume show put on by a collector of old gowns.  Attitudes about church money were changing fast in those days.  I doubt that the rising generation had much sympathy with the tried-and-not-so-true methods of raising money.  Nor did young marrieds have the time.  As I look back, I have to say the people at St. Stephen’s preferred the straightforward annual pledge plus extra giving in the year.  At least one person, who would have been reluctant to work at a rummage sale, told me that she was so accustomed to making payments on the family’s pledge toward building the Parish House that we ought to think up another project now that the building was almost paid for.  We were never an affluent church, but our income, and our expenses, increased steadily year after year.  My salary, when we departed, was $8,500.  We always paid our diocesan Assessment, but we did reduce our Quota somewhat when we were building the parish house.

After meetings of the Evening Group, some of the women often retired to Gruning’s in South Orange for ice cream.  The rector was not invited.  And once a year there was a dinner, I heard, at Snuffy’s in Scotch Plains.

There had always been an Altar Guild at St. Stephen’s.  One of my predecessors insisted that the members be unmarried.  He was, of course, thinking of the virgins dedicated to the Vestal temple in ancient Rome.  Personally, I think he was going too far.  When he married one of the Altar Guild members, he made her resign.  When I came to St. Stephen’s, the Directress was an Englishwoman of quiet, saintly character. She was assisted by another Englishwoman, Muriel James, who meticulously managed Altar Guild funds.  Later on Eileen Sisco directed the Altar Guild with genial firmness.

Another “organization” was the Prayer Group led by Mildred Kienzle that met every Tuesday after the 10 o’clock Eucharist.  I was not tempted to impose professional clericalism on those people, for I had complete confidence in them.  For some years the Prayer Group sponsored a Healing Mission, a most satisfactory event that brought people from various churches from all over North Jersey.           

            We also had a strong acolytes’ organization—all boys in those days, of course—with great esprit de corps.  We used to go on camping trips to a place my family owned in the Poconos.  But concerning teenagers, I don’t think I was notably successful as a high school group leader at St. Stephen’s.  Six men did enroll in seminary, and five were ordained.  We also had a father-son club for a time.

The Church in the 1950’s was indeed a (mostly) men-only affair as far as administration was concerned.  Women were not allowed on the Vestry or at Diocesan conventions.  The idea of a woman ordinand was laughable.  When the canon permitting women on a Vestry became effective, we thought we would be really modern and elect a woman.  Unfortunately, our particular choice was not a good one, for the lady tended to weep whenever a decision displeased her.  That made the more chauvinistic men present more than ever convinced it was unwise to have women on Vestries.  I understand that in this regard things have changed at St. Stephen’s.

In the years since we left St. Stephen’s, I have often heard clergy elsewhere complain about living in a rectory next to the church.  I always reply that for nine years we lived across the lawn from the church, and only very rarely did people intrude on us.  Indeed, we encouraged the use of the house.  It was always used for Vestry meetings and some Sunday School classes before the Parish House was built.  There was at least one wedding in our front room, and we had two wedding receptions there.  One of them was when Alice Dickinson was married in the church and we invited her to have the reception afterward in her old home.  We found it a charming, convenient house.

All of what I’m writing seems to evoke an unsullied Eden-on-the-Rahway, nine years of pure joy.  So it does seem now.  But I know my recollection of perfect times in Millburn isn’t entirely accurate.  Barbara reminds me that there were times when the sailing wasn’t easy.  We did indeed have one bruising Parish fight.  It had to do with a man who wanted to be elected to the Vestry.  He was defeated two consecutive years.  (But I never announced the number of votes for and against him, so I suppose he went to his grave thinking it was a close call; it wasn’t.)  He left the parish in considerable rage, which I regretted because I enjoyed his company.  Now I realize I could have managed the contretemps  more adroitly.  Less well known by the congregation at large was the agitation that arose when some of us promoted an “equal housing” document in Millburn Township.  Our proposal would hardly raise an eyebrow now, but the 1960’s had not yet hit in all their fury.  Some people hissed, “We know you signed THAT PAPER” (to which I wanted to reply, “Hell, I helped write it!”).  We lost a few families because of the equal-rights paper.

One awkward episode amuses us still.  There was a woman in the congregation who was usually annoyed at someone or something.  On one occasion—it was about a month after Barbara and I were married—I was the object of the lady’s wrath.  Passing Barbara at the Parish House door, she said, “Oh! I could wring your husband’s neck.”  “So could I,” replied Barbara.

When Mr. Dickinson resigned, the Vestry was fearful that candidates would be deterred by the responsibilities of a cemetery at St. Stephen’s.  The cemetery was Mr. Dickinson’s pride and joy, and he left it in excellent condition.  In those days the cemetery was far better endowed than the church, and its funds were managed by the Summit Trust Company.  The Vestry engaged a parishioner to manage the cemetery, Amy Powell.  She was capable at the financial records and payrolls, but it was soon obvious that the rector of St. Stephen’s was not easily relieved of cemetery chores.  Undertakers and families from far and near telephoned St. Stephen’s when they wanted to have a grave opened or discuss an old plot or purchase a new one.  Also, I had some experience in cemetery management and, most important, saw the cemetery as a pastoral opportunity.  The records were somewhat casual, and the actual places of burial were not always known.  I tried, as far as I was able, to draw up a file of all the lots.  I think this was later used, and much improved.  I need to say that I inherited two excellent groundskeepers, John Columbro (who was loved in our family) and his assistant, Salvatore.  When I departed the parish, these two were also maintaining the church grounds, for we had long since lost our sexton in the academic gown.

I have tried not to name the lay people who were so conspicuously loyal and such enthusiastic members in the congregation.  The one or two I have mentioned were so very special in sharing their talents that I couldn’t avoid their names.  As I write, the faces and the kindnesses of many, many people flow through my memory.  When I read the parish paper these days, I see few familiar names.  Many people have died, including young persons whom we expected to live much longer.  Many people have moved elsewhere and, I trust, strengthened their new churches with the same energy we saw at St. Stephen’s.  I suppose some have lost their faith, at least for a while, and are adrift.

It would be folly to list names, but it might be informative on this 150th anniversary if I tried to categorize the families I knew at St. Stephen’s.  There were, first of all, those who had been members of the church since it was founded in 1852.  Yes!  We still had some such families; the Whittinghams and Hamiltons come to mind.  Then there were those, and there were many, whose parents or grandparents had come to work in Millburn’s paper and hat factories in the later years of the 19th century.  The next great spurt of growth—and it was after some years of decay because the factories had closed—was in the 1920’s, when families moved to Millburn and Springfield, where housing developments offered opportunities for people from Newark and Elizabeth.  It is worth a sociological note to say that in the 1950’s we had few families in the South Mountain neighborhood.  I was told that many of our families there lost their homes in the Depression.  We still had our share of Millburn Avenue shopkeepers.  I think there are none of their shops left now, and the character of Millburn’s shops has changed.  In 1957 we drew our membership mostly from Millburn and Springfield, and a few from Union.  The garden apartments had just been opened, and some of the people there, especially retirees, joined us.  Later we had a surprisingly strong coterie from Summit seeking an intimate parish life.  Again on a sociological note, I might add that the Welcome Wagon refused to provide us with names and addresses of newcomers—but did supply them to Christ Church.  The people who came to us sought us out or were brought to St. Stephen’s by our members.

Those who knew her will expect me to mention the name of Myrtle Livingston.  I think she was one of the most Christian people I have ever known, but Oh, how she would shrink from my saying that.  When I came to St. Stephen’s, she and her brother Irving, both lifelong members of St. Stephen’s—and Irv a Warden for many years— were retired and living in the Spring Street house where Myrtle was born.  She was a Registered Nurse and a trained secretary.  If memory serves, Myrtle was still (in 1966) the Millburn High School graduate holding the highest average in its history, but of course, she was not among those who told me that.  For many years she was Executive Director of the Neighborhood House.  It was indeed an inspired moment when I asked Myrtle to be parish secretary—three mornings at $15 a week.  She was thoughtful, wise, and loving.  She had been in on the Sunday school revival in the early 1950’s and, of course, knew everyone in the parish.  When I would propose something, she was likely to say, “But Mr. Lindsley, we ALWAYS did it” such-and-such a way.  And then we would both laugh because though she was a conservative old-timer, no one was more exultant about the progress of St. Stephen’s.  She was also generously optimistic about the abilities of the rector, but I cannot say she was entirely uncritical.  I wish every priest in the Church had a helpful and caring assistant like Myrtle Livingston.

There is no place as dear to a minister as his first parish.  One of the reasons for this, I think, is that people are apt to be understanding and forgiving of earnest youth.  In this, St. Stephen’s measured up admirably.  It was God’s gift to me, and I will never forget His bounty or cease to be grateful for St. Stephen’s.

James Elliott Lindsley

29 June 2001